Leonardo L.

Results 28 issues of Leonardo L.

partially fixes [#1422](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/issues/1422) ### Description It updates the rust-bitcoin to 0.32.0, the `bitcoin` crate dependency. _NOTE: The overall BDK update to `0.32.0` still requires and depends on some other crates,...

partially fixes [#1422](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/issues/1422) ### Description It updates the `bitcoind`, and the `electrum-client` crate dependencies. The dependencies `electrum-client`, `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-core-rpc` still depends on unreleased versions, that's why it patches the...

### Description ### Notes to the reviewers ### Changelog notice ### Checklists #### All Submissions: * [ ] I've signed all my commits * [ ] I followed the [contribution...

**Describe the enhancement** As noticed in #1448 and #1424 there are some unused error variants on [`SignerError`](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/e406675f43422da14267a16326d429a53369fb52/crates/wallet/src/wallet/signer.rs#L135-L174) **Use case** Do we need such variants, e.g `sighash::TaprootError`, `transaction::TxInputsIndexError`, or should it...

new feature
module-wallet
api

**Describe the enhancement** It's a branch-out issue from both #1448 and #1468, as suggested this issue is specifically meant for trying to reproduce the expected panic! (insatiable descriptor), and fix...

new feature
module-wallet

**Describe the enhancement** In the new release of rust-bitcoin `0.32.0` the new `NetworkKind` type has been introduced, it's not being explicitly used in the PR #1448, but it should be...

enhancement

partially completes #4752 ### Description This PR adds support to establish connections to federation peers over the Tor network, it uses the [`arti-client`](https://crates.io/crates/arti-client), an official Rust implementation of Tor. It's...

partially completes https://github.com/fedimint/fedimint/issues/4752 depends on #5443

depends on https://github.com/paritytech/jsonrpsee/pull/1419 fixes https://github.com/fedimint/fedimint/pull/5441#issuecomment-2161666413