B. Ogan Mancarcı
B. Ogan Mancarcı
ah, just something akin to "pst i just removed this bit in this context" would be enough
The examples given seem to be returning the correct results now
Just added a rudimentary function to add a scale bar. The information you need is available through `getSectionImage` and `getAtlasImage` which include the resolution information in pixels for the images....
Just forgot to push the all important black pixel. Should be fine now
- [ ] a parameter to draw a scalebar for x microns - Gravity options shouldn't be essential since all margins are in ratios instead of pixels. - [ ]...
I am unsure if this is particularly necessary since samples endpoint provides all the relevant information
Don't know how necessary this is. Nathaniel's scripts ran weekly. Getting all datasets by pagination using the /datasets endpoint takes a little more than a minute. Would recommend closing this...
Could we add a little hash that represents the whole result as part of the output? That'd allow checking for integrity
It should be fine as far as I can see. `factors` were never processed it seems but i could use an example where `factors` currently appears
ok found one looking at https://gemma.msl.ubc.ca/rest/v2/datasets/GSE49712/samples. it does appear that `factorValueObjects` are already present. i assume the change will only be removal of `factors`?