Oscar Dowson
Oscar Dowson
Hi @apfelix, take a read of this tutorial I wrote for the JuMP documentation: https://jump.dev/JuMP.jl/stable/tutorials/getting_started/tolerances/ It includes an explanation for why you get inconsistent feasibility detection, including why presolve is...
@apfelix did you write that quoted text or did you copy it from somewhere? That is not a summary to take from the JuMP tutorial. My summary would be: there...
We can just do what we do for Ipopt: https://github.com/jump-dev/Ipopt.jl/blob/4c156461ef1fda3c9f015520197afda4e8ca3e26/src/Ipopt.jl#L13-L19
A reproducible example is: ```Julia julia> using Coluna julia> using Gurobi julia> using JuMP julia> using BlockDecomposition julia> begin columns = [ (cover = [1, 0, 1], load = 1.2),...
I guess we could be more permissive here: https://github.com/jump-dev/Gurobi.jl/blob/f32c04d9956cfc88b28c69fd877ff2abb705b4a3/src/MOI_wrapper/MOI_wrapper.jl#L1104-L1105 But the underlying issue is: why such long names?
The issue is unrelated to how many elements there are in `indices`. This issue is because JuMP creates a name for the constraint as: `"basicCoverage[$i]"`. You almost certainly don't want...
> needs to set this limit on the name sizes even though the solver allows for such long names The Julia package is not setting the size limit. It is...
Closed by #580
What's the full stack trace of the error?
Is this on the latest tagged version or the latest `master`?