Alex Nadalin

What do you find confusing? On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 6:50 AM Adrian Ho wrote: > IMO, the current scoping rules of ABS are quite confusing. Perhaps a >...

I agree it's a bit weird since in a reasonable environment you'd get an error for that: ``` >>> x = 1 >>> def test(): ... x = x +...

I am generally not against improving flags, but adding a type system or type hints there might be overkill. Surely having something like go's flag.Args could be useful though. Though...

hey @gryffyn, sorry for missing this one out! :open_mouth: I think a completely separate function is a bit annoying, I could be open to maybe having a default named argument...

We already have n args to echo eg. `echo("%s %s", "hi", "mark")` so this would be hard to support

I'm aligned with your other option, but I'm skeptical that we should have a different function as I don't think it's a good DX. The problem with not printing new...

We should then remove `f` in ABS 3.

On the fence on this. JavaScript uses `""` as default when no argument is passed, so I was thinking of doing the same, but I'm open to suggestion -- especially...

You won me with the for in example :) I think it makes sense to do for char in str.split() On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 3:18 PM Klaus Alexander...

This is a "known" bug, and the reason we fundamentally deprecated the `$()` syntax :-S https://www.abs-lang.org/syntax/system-commands#alternative--syntax Long story short, the code that parses `$()` blocks is a bit wonky, and...