Stefano Carbonelli

Ah! I am ok with this, and I think that MAX_NOTES = 192 can be easily be multiplied by further factors. (Still it whould be multiple of 192, unless you...

@theGreatWhiteShark > But maybe (just thinking aloud with nothing to back it up) the time in here would be in frames and the ticks don't have to be integers anymore...

> I don't see why it would need to be limited to multiples of 192 to allow precision for triplets and 64th notes.

yes of course, when it comes dynamic

I think loud here: why do we need an integer position in ticks depending on TPQN?? I am thinking to something that is quite different but maybe the modification is...

some more reflections > the time in here would be in frames and the ticks don't have to be integers anymore (with a function mapping between frames and ticks) @theGreatWhiteShark...

My thought about the explicit representation was not for the GUI only but for a precise representation of how rhythms are written in scores (which the GUI has to represent)....

> It should depend on the use. Mostly I think that use tends to be mapping click positions to notes (that isn't as well isolated as it should be) in...

> Being able to adjust the pitch of and instrument with a single knob (+-24 semitones and +- 50 cents, next to the random pitch knob maybe?) done!

@trebmuh > where? (which commit/branch?) #1000 @theGreatWhiteShark > Do you know if we support Rubberband by now? The output of cmake does still suggest that there are problems and the...