Yusuke Oda

(EDIT: as for the new function names) Using `latexify.expression` or something similar would be good. I also guess that the current function names `with_latex` and `get_latex` is weird a little;...

Maybe it could be a choice to provide a global function `latexify.set_config()` to modify the default behavior: ```python import latexify latexify.set_config(...) # Calls it before any @with_latex decorators. @with_latex def...

For this particular implementation, it looks somewhat dangerous because... - object method (`__init__`) globally changes the class attributes. - `dir()` returns every visible symbol of all super classes. - `kwargs`...

Well, the essential point I am thinking of is these flags should not be class attributes since it would be changed every time we invoked `__init__`. And introspection is basically...

This issue is taken by #66 , close for now.

possible logic: ```python inner_config = copy(config if config is not None else Config.defaults()) for each kwarg: inner_config.update(kwarg) inner_process(fn, inner_config) ```

@chunibyo-wly Thanks for working on this. Since this feature should be carefully designed, could you provide your idea about the implementation before throwing PRs?

@chunibyo-wly Sure. I targeted this feature on the release after the next (0.3) so we don't need to rush at this point.

@Pratikshaekbote You need to process the CLA before merging this change. Please refer to the bot message, and re-assign me after you signed it.

@Pratikshaekbote Hi, your action is required to merge this pull request. Could you review my comment above?