Naming of builders

[hannesm]

Dear Madam or Sir,

I notice that it is rather hard to digest "debian-12-4.14_arm32_opam-2.1" and "debian-12-4.14_arm64_opam-2.1" -- since the most interesting part is not the Linux distribution in this case, but the platform. If you could do a minor tweak, and have "ARM32 OCaml 4.14.? opam 2.1 on Debian 12 GNU/Linux", that'd be amazing.

I understand that not always the platform is the most interesting bit, and sometimes your order (linux distribution first) makes sense. But especially for these non-standard platforms, they're important (as is e.g. if there's a builder using the experimental opam 2.2 -- which is its unique selling point). So, I don't propose to have the platform always in the front -- but I guess you get the idea and will (due to your enhanced knowledge on why a specific builder is enabled and used) know what the most important thing of each builder is (and put that in front).

Thanks a lot for reading! And for your free of charge service.