Renato Cavalcanti

@two10 no progress so far. I even don't know if there is a clear consensus about this. Process Managers are so distinct that either it's preferable to build your own...

Hi @PerWiklander, I didn't have yet the time to have a look on that impl, but you might be interested in this discussion on Discourse.

Ops, forget the link: https://discuss.lightbend.com/t/implementing-the-saga-compensating-transaction-pattern-in-lagom/2565/2

no, this is not on our roadmap right now.

You can import `lagom/build.sbt` instead. The difference being that it won't include the documents snippets when compiling. That's mostly ok. I never import the `docs/build.sbt`. I do check the docs...

Happened again https://travis-ci.com/github/lagom/lagom/jobs/477967225#L1051

and again https://travis-ci.com/github/lagom/lagom/jobs/478553950#L997-L998

One more for our collection https://travis-ci.com/github/lagom/lagom/jobs/487506556#L968

@viktorklang, can we sync on that to avoid having different APIs? Unless this is something that needs to be completely different because of its nature. But in any case, ultimately,...

I got it. Thanks for the explanation.