Renato Cavalcanti

One second thought... The `InMemoryBackend` works with the `IdentityInterpreter` which interpret everything to `Identity[_]`. We could have a `AbstractInMemoryBackend[F[_]]` and some implementations that that defines the type of `F[_]`. So,...

There is nothing holding you to have multiple aggregates. Have you tried it?

No, that won't be possible. In general, events from different aggregates are saved on the same journal, because it's the journal of your system. If they are on the same...

Good point. Scala 2.12 is almost there so we could put support for Xor on hold and have it only for the new biased Either. And of course, support for...

I have done some progress on this (only analysis and some basic design) and some ideas and issues cames to the surface. The main problem I'm facing right now is...

It's now possible to build an extensions (ie: new InvokerDirectives) for Cats (see #63). However, I'm considering making Cats a full citizen in Fun.CQRS. I'm using it in an internal...

Have you followed this guide? https://developer.lightbend.com/guides/openshift-deployment/lagom/building-using-sbt.html

Yes, sure.

I'm fine with it.

> did you see my comment regarding dependencyManagement on the parent POM instead of duplicate dependencies on each of the Impl POM's ? No, I didn't. Good point.