Ollie Charles

As `` and `` are essentially another form of function application, I think it makes intuitive sense to format it as suggested. If you remove those operators, you should get...

```haskell hello = {-# SCC hello #-} 42 ``` Should be enough to break it.

I think this would also help in the situation where you want to have multiple rows per list item.

> I slightly prefer a previous attempt where I modified the rowAttrs to take the sort index allowing one to set display: none, which is better for screen readers. Could...

I'm still misunderstanding exactly why you want `display: none` over not even having the element. What changes for a screen reader?

https://github.com/stil4m/elm-analyse/issues/89 requests a warning on excessively indented code.

Yea, I agree - "too much" is hard to define, but I think indentation is a good measure. I think nested lets aren't necessarily a smell, I usually end up...

That sounds perfectly reasonable to me. The community may well discover a common parameter.

It will only work on GHC 8.6, as that's the first compiler with source plugins support. I will add a note On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, 7:25 am bfrk, wrote:...

I'd just like to add my support for this request - I've just ran into some code that needs a `[String]`, but I seem to be out of luck in...