obs-backgroundremoval icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
obs-backgroundremoval copied to clipboard

Missing binary for Linux in the latest release 0.4.0

Open Maverobot opened this issue 3 years ago • 9 comments

obs-backgroundremoval*.tar.zst is missing in the "Assets" of the latest release 0.4.0.

Maverobot avatar Nov 10 '21 12:11 Maverobot

yes i haven't gotten around to create it for Arch linux yet.. but it should be easy. i'll try to do it asap

royshil avatar Nov 19 '21 02:11 royshil

Thanks. Maybe it can be a good idea to set up a GitHub action for creating the library automatically?

Maverobot avatar Nov 19 '21 07:11 Maverobot

i created a GitHub Action https://github.com/royshil/obs-backgroundremoval/pull/61 it builds OK but it doesn't create a distributable package what would be useful? a .deb package? i can try to make a .deb package.. it might not work for everybody though it could be a .zip file which you unpack manually (heck .deb is just a zip with a manifest...)

royshil avatar Nov 23 '21 03:11 royshil

Thanks for the effort. A debian package would be more than welcome! One can always unpack a deb file if he wants. But once you have cpack set up in cmake, you can generate both deb and tar.gz at the same time without extra effort.

Maverobot avatar Nov 24 '21 07:11 Maverobot

Yes an archive we can extract in the right directory would be enough

PhieF avatar Dec 01 '21 14:12 PhieF

I would also love a Debian package!

deonblaauw avatar Dec 18 '21 17:12 deonblaauw

Chiming in to mention that I too would love a Debian package :)

benterova avatar Dec 21 '21 23:12 benterova

I have attempted to install from the build instructions and copy the files into obs plugins folder (using Flatpak OBS). It failed to load a .so file (not sure how to fix that, the .so is installed in my system as per instructions for libonn*)

Would love a Flatpak compatible way - I can try to check the build instructions as they seem to be prepared to generate the .deb (and that worked for me on my local Debian 11 install). I hasn't used the local .deb because I'm having better success (i.e., browser sources) using the Flatpak build instead of Debian build.

ronoaldo avatar Feb 11 '22 16:02 ronoaldo

Bumping this issue, as anything (zst, deb, or tar.gz) would be better than nothing.

khionu avatar Mar 18 '22 03:03 khionu

linux builds now part of the release binaries

more types of linux coming: flatpk, arch, etc.

royshil avatar Mar 18 '23 14:03 royshil