Using 'has phenotype' without a 'has disease' relationship

[laurenechan]

I am currently working on a schema to document environmental exposures at an instance level and am hoping to include a relationship between a "human individual" and a disease (for example a Mondo term). As I was developing this schema, I realized there is not currently a relationship 'has disease' that I can use to connect my individual person and their presenting disease for this instance. I believe 'has phenotype' could be used in this scenario, but would it be appropriate to have a distinct 'has disease' relation to use?

@cmungall

[cmungall]

I propose

• has associated phenotype or disease NEW
  • has phenotype
  • has disease NEW

The domain intentionally broad as per has phenotype

[matentzn]

@laurenechan do you want to try to implement the proposed? I can help you on slack..

[nlharris]

@laurenechan did you get what you needed from Nico?

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has not seen any activity in the past 2 years. It will be closed automatically 60 days from now if no action is taken.

[ddooley]

Looks like this was implemented in RO, and issue should have been closed. Doing so now.