upheno
upheno copied to clipboard
Initiate pattern review process with HPO
I propose the establishment of a workgroup between @rays22 and @LCCarmody for the purpose of reviewing HPO. This is how I envision this to work:
- We match pattern by pattern in an ongoing fashion (this is now standard in ODK and I already have implemented this today for HPO)
- We copy 5 patterns at once in a Google Sheet and have @LCCarmody review it
- Once reviewed, we use the "pattern merge workflow" to factor the updated definitions in hpo-edit.owl (remember, we are not using dosdp patterns directly in HPO)
- We keep a new directory "src/patterns/data/reviewed" where we copy all of the matched patterns after review is finished
- We keep matching-updating reviewed patterns so that changes can be monitored by @LCCarmody over time
Steps to get started:
- [x] Upload first 5 templates from
src/patterns/data/matchesto a Google sheet and share with @LCCarmody - [ ] Set up a weekly call with @LCCarmody to discuss findings
Are you ok with this @LCCarmody and @rays22?
My apologies, I didn't see this. Yes, I definitely think there are terms we could go over--and have weekly meetings
Data tables for review: Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) - EQ Review 2022/23