Add present_in_taxon statements

[balhoff]

Add present_in_taxon statements for male and female external genitalia to ensure they work in both mammals and insects. These terms are used in the AISM ontology; this will ensure that the usage remains valid as the ontology changes.

cc @JCGiron @sergeitarasov

[JCGiron]

I would also edit the definition of external male genitalia to make it clear that "including the penis and scrotum" is just an example and not the whole extent of the usage of this term.

[balhoff]

Thanks @JCGiron, I made a small tweak to the definition.

[cmungall]

This looks good. You should feel free to propose a more significantly altered definition that is less biased to mammals (I am not a fan of the GO-style definitions that say "an example of this is found in " when the true applicability is much broader).

@balhoff I have some ideas about more powerful present-in axioms that would entail some of these more specific statements

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 5:00 PM Jim Balhoff @.***> wrote:

Thanks @JCGiron https://github.com/JCGiron, I made a small tweak to the definition.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/pull/3172#issuecomment-1892924579, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOLKPJO25GDRQYEU763YOXGLRAVCNFSM6AAAAABBYTLZMGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQOJSHEZDINJXHE . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

[github-actions[bot]]

This PR has not seen any activity in the past month; if nobody comments or reviews it in the next week, the PR creator will be allowed to proceed with merging without explicit approval, should they wish to do so.

[github-actions[bot]]

This PR has not seen any activity in the past month; if nobody comments or reviews it in the next week, the PR creator will be allowed to proceed with merging without explicit approval, should they wish to do so.