Fix problematic relation URIs

[cthoyt]

There are several problematic URIs for relationships defined in UBERON:

URI	number of edges with this URI
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#proximally_connected_to	27
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#extends_fibers_into	16
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#channel_for	16
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#distally_connected_to	13
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#channels_into	7
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#channels_from	6
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#subdivision_of	5
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#protects	4
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#posteriorly_connected_to	2
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#evolved_from	2
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/core#anteriorly_connected_to	2

In https://obo-communitygroup.slack.com/archives/C023P0Z304T/p1662990715744149?thread_ts=1662990299.268959&cid=C023P0Z304T, Nico stated that there are two allowed flavors for terms:

• http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IDSPACE_XXXXXX
• http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/idspace#xxxxxx (only for properties)

[shawntanzk]

Related to https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/issues/2445

[matentzn]

This is due to the ontology ID in the OBO file. should be uberon, not uberon/core

[anitacaron]

This is part of the general issue of not having numerical identifiers, which we'll fix soon. The complete list is here https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/issues/2827

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has not seen any activity in the past 6 months; it will be closed automatically one year from now if no action is taken.