Anatomical cluster seems misplaced

[sebastianduesing]

Anatomical cluster is defined as a type of anatomical group (specifically, "Anatomical group that has its parts adjacent to one another."). However, it is not a subclass of anatomical group; rather, anatomical group is a subclass of anatomical structure, which is a subclass of material anatomical entity, which in turn is a sibling class of anatomical cluster. Either anatomical cluster should be moved to be a subclass of anatomical group, or its definition should be changed so that it isn't defined as a type of anatomical group while not actually being one.

[shawntanzk]

Thanks for bringing this up, as this is an upper modelling issue, pinging @dosumis & @cmungall (+ whoever who has opinions on this) to comment (will assign it accordingly too).

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has not seen any activity in the past 6 months; it will be closed automatically one year from now if no action is taken.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has been closed automatically because it has not been updated in 18 months. Please re-open if you still need this to be addressed.