Olivier M

The script https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/doc/NEWS-update.jl of Julia itself can be of interest for that purpose too

Still an issue @ CSTParser v3.3.6 ```julia @testset for (arg, exp) in eachrow([ """ :.' """ QuoteNode(:var".'") ; # issue 316 """ g f """ Expr(:call, :, 1, :f)) ;...

> dup of 316 answer Still an issue @ CSTParser v3.3.6 ```julia @testset for (arg, exp) in eachrow([ """ :.' """ QuoteNode(:var".'") ; # issue 316 """ g f """...

Yes. Julia lacks some kind of a good web framework. I am thinking about something like rack and rake for ruby, or mix and plug for elixir. I have started...

Here is another good example that's missing nowaday  Also consider, those annotations pipelined upto a db that indicate what comes in and out the db itself (may be not...

JuliaCollections has been created since and should better match the discrete math part

rustc compiler handles things this way. see https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/implementing_new_features.html https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/feature-gates.html interop with the ast is handled too https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_ast_passes/feature_gate/fn.check_crate.html there is macro for this (w rust macro_rules eg composable matchable macro )

Things may become strange IIUC, since parenthesis may be peeled differently if we use a do block (right side) or not (left side of the call). Here is another proposal...

FWIW gpx studio provides a nice editing experience. Their github mentions that > Each time you add or move a track point, we make a request to GraphHopper Routing API...

The list of matchers should also include - https://github.com/JuliaSymbolics/Metatheory.jl/blob/master/src/matchers.jl - https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/v1.8.5/src/match.scm