Nyall Dawson

@jancaha not yet. Playing with it today revealed that there's a lot of parameter settings which get lost when converting to script codes. I'll have to fix these upstream, but...

By the way - this was inspired by your docs. Making parameters is one of the hardest/least user friendly parts of designing algorithms!

Hmm... I think with the parameter description work done in 3.0 we should be able to safely resurrect this now!

> I'll try to check your changes soon and see how our repos diverged. I'm more than happy to do this and submit PRs, if you are indeed seeking for...

Hmm - I think the only way we could do this would be to have some set of tokens which are used to identify a part of the script which...

This is normal r behaviour, not anything specific to this plugin. Have a read over the integer64 section on https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/rgdal/versions/1.4-4/topics/readOGR for explanation. We could change to warn.loss mode here, but...

I would say you could cast the required field values to int when using them. The alternative is if we expose this as an option for the input. But that...

I would suggest grabbing the actualy R script which is output when you run the algorithm, and then run this script in R alone. Get the script working as desired...

> OK, I tried different approaches to handle this, as for some unknown reason I couldn't change the field layer type using the 'refactor field' tool. May I was using...

@lordofbikes No problem, I totally understand! I'll hold off on the prs until you're ready