Ryo Ota

Thank you very much for your great PR! I'd like to use allowlist instead of whitelist (related to #BlackLivesMatter). Name `allowed-users` might be better like `allowed-associations`.

As you said in the comment: https://github.com/nwtgck/actions-comment-run/issues/263 > so is allowed-associations necessary? Maybe this could be switched to allowed-users? It will be better to delete `allowed-associations` in the future. Actually,...

@mieubrisse Thanks for your PR and your changes. I'd like to merge this PR as soon as possible. ~~But, I have one concern. Users of this action might confuse the...

@mieubrisse Thanks. I misread the condition of `!associationMatches && !userMatches`. I'm clear about the issue and the PR now. First, we should remove `allowed-associations` (breaking change). Second I'd like to...

@mieubrisse I understand you. I know you spent time to implement this feature. I should have noticed `restricts` thing earlier. > I have a client blocked on it, ... If...

@mieubrisse Hi, You can run the following code to regenerate it. ```bash cd npm ci npm run all ```

@jonas-kgomo I'm not sure what the bot does. Could tell me what you want to do?

@jonas-kgomo I don't completely understand. Do you mean that a user creates an issue on your website, and then the creation of the first issue triggers to create another issue...

If I understand your request correctly, You can use `if: contains(github.event.comment.body, 'on ')` and you can comment like the following. ````md @github-actions run on ```sh #! /bin/sh # Do something...

@ibnesayeed Thanks for your contribution again. The patch will reduce unnecessary computation and time on GitHub Actions. But, I wouldn't like to increase files hard coding "@github-actions run" as possible....