Nuo Mi
Nuo Mi
@frankplow could you help with this? This is related to vui_progressive_source_flag and vui_interlaced_source_flag in vui_parameters. we can follow the same thing in hevc. thank you
How about hevc, we can follow the hevc's behavior. here may have some hevc interlaced clips: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/5514
@frankplow , how about we just add the current ffmpeg output md5 to our test? and give some comments on the commit log thank you
Yes. not needed. Please help add 1 or 2 virtual boundary clips with the largest coverage to fate. thank you
> Please help add 1 or 2 virtual boundary clips with the largest coverage to fate. @frankplow , could you help this? thank you
hot spot functions are here https://github.com/ffvvc/FFmpeg/blob/3cb136dc5fc70d65f9918453a842439323e81908/libavcodec/vvcdsp_template.c#L353 https://github.com/ffvvc/FFmpeg/blob/3cb136dc5fc70d65f9918453a842439323e81908/libavcodec/vvcdsp_template.c#L771
dmvr_mv_refine called by derive_sb_mv. I guess subblocks are constrained. you can check the mi->num_sb_x assignment
@stone-d-chen, thank you, Before you send the patch, could you add: av_assert0(w == 16 && h == 16 || w == 8 && h == 16 || w == 16...
> > @stone-d-chen, thank you, > > Before you send the patch, could you add: av_assert0(w == 16 && h == 16 || w == 8 && h == 16...
merged as https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/d82c5035558730f0d1f2e5aec66df6d0db7f4e6f thank you stone