Tadej Novak

I wonder if we want to make this an optional feature? This would allow us to fix Qt later for example. Also what is the binary size increase? (@louwers, didn't...

We should clarify if it's required or not as people are periodically asking. Note that AFAIK Mapbox required it more to attribute the maps themselves and not the SDK.

This I knew but I think it's not documented anywhere.

Yes, but I suspect we then also need proper platform support for all OSes.

We put new platforms in separate repositories now, especially if they interface C++ directly and do not need anything else.

It depends, we now have a proposal for Xamarin where they do not need to touch the core to provide bindings. It depends on how much platform-specific stuff you want...

I'm starting with Qt. I have an initial prototype done, but I want to make it build reliably before I open a PR. The rest will follow when relevant people...

We should move the platforms organisation to https://github.com/maplibre/maplibre-native/pull/789 It is important to stress platform vs SDK/bindings difference (some people do not like SDK in this context, but maybe it helps...

What is the motivation for this? I guess also other references should be renamed if we want to proceed.

Which platform? Note that in this specific case I suspect that the image never gets valid. Can you confirm that?