Robert Nemeti

@metacosm thanks for getting back to me on this. you are right, I'm also a bit confused about where the problems stems, I came across your comment above, mentioning the...

@metacosm sorry for bothering you again. I think I found the cause. The latest version of Keycloak-operator uses `quarkus-operator-sdk` version `4.0.4`, I tried to run the keycloak-operator with the version...

> I will look into whether that's indeed what's currently going on and see if the previous behaviour could be restored but, as mentioned, this will only work if the...

I tried that as well with the stock keycloak-operator version 20.0.2 (latest ), but unfortunately it doesn't work. furthermore I built now a keycloak-operator image with quarkus-operator-sdk `4.0.3`. this works...

@metacosm I built the image with version `4.0.5` but unfortunately still doesn't take into account `QUARKUS_OPERATOR_SDK_CONTROLLERS_KEYCLOAKCONTROLLER_NAMESPACES`

sure, here are the steps: ``` # kubectl create ns keycloak-ns # kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/keycloak/keycloak-k8s-resources/20.0.2/kubernetes/keycloaks.k8s.keycloak.org-v1.yml # kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/keycloak/keycloak-k8s-resources/20.0.2/kubernetes/keycloakrealmimports.k8s.keycloak.org-v1.yml # kubectl -n keycloak-ns apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/keycloak/keycloak-k8s-resources/20.0.2/kubernetes/kubernetes.yml # kubectl...

@metacosm have you got the chance to give it a try?

@metacosm, works like a charm. thank you for the quick fix! ``` 2023-01-24 21:59:33,571 INFO [io.qua.ope.run.OperatorProducer] (main) Quarkus Java Operator SDK extension 4.0.7 (commit: 476e349 on branch: 476e34936ba0620871ddedb6c 1e3ac5ad576c6ce) built...

> I'm getting a "Legacy debug adapter is deprecated. Please comment on [issue 3096](https://github.com/golang/vscode-go/issues/3096) if this impacts your workflows." message when I debug locally. > > The configuration I'm running...

Sorry for chiming in, my question is not directly related but the snippets are very useful for my question. What is the reason of providing the wal_s3_bucket multiple times, once...