Nicolas Rinaudo

The `generic` module is an all-or-nothing affair. It would be better to let users only derive instances for the types they need.

Failed test cases will often be reduced too far and not be very useful.

No documentation is generated for packages that only contain a package object

1

For example, the `java8` module. This appears to be a scaladoc bug.

See [machinist](https://github.com/typelevel/machinist).

We currently only support identifying groups by index. It'd be nice to have name support, possibly with labelled generics from Shapeless?

Failed test cases will often be reduced too far and not be very useful.

No documentation is generated for packages that only contain a package object

1

For example, the `java8` module. This appears to be a scaladoc bug.

See [machinist](https://github.com/typelevel/machinist).