Nils Philippsen

@dennisklein Your check is too lenient, though 😉 (but the error message in the plugin is misleading): it works anywhere in the worktree, but it should only continue there if...

I’ve looked into it more closely and it seems like just checking these couple files or directories doesn’t cover all the options how a git work tree can be defined....

I have the same issue (with version 1.16.0, on Fedora Linux 40 FWIW) – having to declare the broker at the time the module is imported makes flexible configuration unnecessarily...

Hi! And sorry for the late response. Contrary to what I wrote over 4 years ago 😉, I would refactor `models.py` a bit more, i.e. make a `database` package that...

> Hey @nphilipp , could you please rebase or allow me to rebase your branch? Hmm, the PR has _Allow edits and access to secrets by maintainers_ checked, but I’ll...

I've browsed related issues and it seems that enough repo updates concerning fedmod are available to be consumed: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/raw?topic=org.fedoraproject.prod.mdapi.repo.update&package=fedmod

Hmm, apparently we'll support plain OpenID with ipsilon ⇒ IPA still. Closing.

@praiskup I think what @Conan-Kudo meant is (correct me if I'm wrong), that if we have the hashes only in `sources` and not in the spec file, a plain local...