Novus Nota

Results 209 comments of Novus Nota

Hopefully will be closed by #206, as it covers #75. But it doesn't hurt to double-check :) Going forward, only the formatting/spellchecking issues may cause the same amount of changes,...

Ok, I think that's it — seems like all the built-in functions out there are covered in the docs. Could you please double-check https://docs.tact-lang.org, @anton-trunov @Gusarich @byakuren-hijiri

@Gusarich I think it's better to put functions to where they belong semantically rather than trying to be faithful about their actual origin — users of Tact don't really have...

Good suggestion, and to iterate on it, I think that `remaining` keyword should be described in context of Cells and Builders too (see [this](https://github.com/tact-lang/tact/blob/7ed5e05dc0fcbc880f76fe326ea03aae69a3d966/src/types/resolveABITypeRef.ts#L44)) Useful search showing the usage of...

Agree now, this can be done like you proposed, with simply accumulating stuff and deploying on command. Later though, it would be nice to have at least two versions of...

Accomplished in the compiler repo — for all the new features we add a badge. And if there are any changes, we make a subheading and place the badge there.

General guidelines for TON smart contracts: https://docs.ton.org/develop/smart-contracts/guidelines Security tips: https://docs.ton.org/develop/smart-contracts/security/secure-programming

Depends on #125 and #112. UPD: Not anymore!

> One more issue our users experience with `dump`: how to use it with Blueprint. > > > When creating a new blueprint project I don't have a default tact.config.json...