Andrey Novoseltsev

While less discoverable, I would be in favour of #5511 since it does not complicate the interface.

I thought how nice it would be to have such a button while experimenting with a large course file! And presumably it is easy to do?

I would definitely prefer the last option.

The code insists on nrows dividing the number of entries, with 1..99 it works. So the question is whether this behaviour should be changed.

There are explicit checks for clean divisibility: https://github.com/sagemath/sagecell/blob/master/interact_sagecell.py#L768 This is not written by me, so they have been in place for at least 6 years. Dropping them off leads to...

Of course it is possible, but I imagine will take quite a bit of work in SageMathCell setting and it may not be a feasible approach. All R code in...

Feel free to do it ;-) There are scripts for building a virtual machine for deployment, perhaps it can be used as a start.

It is not maintained (with last activity 2 years ago), so I'd rather not point there from official documentation.

Is it about `lineWrapping` for CodeMirror? Should it just be set to true, or something more elaborate was intended? I am definitely against auto-wrapping output MathJax, but for input code...

The spinner showing computation in progress should be much more obvious, I think - like big and in the middle of the page. Then it would be clear that what...