notaphplover

Hi @davidjgoss, may i do something for you at this point? I see the `incomplete` label on the issue, if you need any additional clarification feel free to reach me...

Hi @davidjgoss, nothing to say sorry for. Thank you so much for the effort! I would prefer the default export exporting a function that returns a promise for a map...

@bashleigh I just noticed you added a changelog, is there any plan to add changes from versions prior to `4.0.0`? If you accept any suggestions, I would encourage you to...

Hi @xenbartolokath , none so far, if you are interested in this feature I would suggest you to thumbs up the issue :smiley:

Hey @davidjgoss, sry for the late reply, I just saw it. All right, I'll go for it :smiley:, I think I should be able to deliver a PR in less...

@haaijman-imagem can you update the branch? After that I would say we can merge it

I would say package manager workspaces are not good enough. Monorepo frameworks solves a lot of problems when working with monorepos, the first that comes to my mind is: given...

@yeongjet is that even possible? Ecmascript decorators are only for classes, methods and properties, and they are not compatible with emitting class metadata. If they could coexist with legacy decorators,...

@murat-mehmet I don't mean to be rude, but, as said, it's not possible today. Inversify requires **parameter** decorators which are not standardized. If you really want us to reopen the...

I would say there's not a single way of accomplishing this. This is more an architecture's question rather than an inversify question imo. What is going to be the responsibility...