Quinten Steenhuis
Concrete next steps: 1. Identify which strings have validation messages 2. Identify which ones might need to be improved 3. Generate some possible replacement language--there should be existing models. See...
@BryceStevenWilley are you saying that something like this: ```yaml question: | Is anyone else on your side of the case? field: users.there_is_another choices: - Yes: True - No: False ```...
I'm still confused about the problems and correct solutions here. Maybe we can add to agenda for next Monday?
Just discussed on admin call, we think that the idea of automatically adding the aria-labelledby is correct. But we also want an `aria-label` modifier upstream, if possible, so people can...
Looking these notes over again, I'm hesitant to change existing questions. It seems like the correct fix is upstream.
That's fine, the upstream label helps
note that there are probably 3 common circumstances for the person who "owns" the profile--being the pro se "user" that maps to `users[0]`, an attorney or an advocate. This implies...
Maybe better would be to use a system where on the profile itself the person identifies whether they are unrepresented or they are an attorney. Then we can use that...
The DAGlobal object makes this really easy to achieve now. It's relevant to a lot of simple use cases where the answer set feature is overkill
I'm not totally opposed to this, but I think choosing a table format is already very opinionated. I don't want to make this flexible to meet use cases we do...