nodejs
buffer: use constexpr where possible
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 90.18%. Comparing base (
723d7bb) to head (6577341). Report is 28 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #58141 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.17% 90.18%
=======================================
Files 630 630
Lines 186473 186473
Branches 36613 36615 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 168160 168166 +6
+ Misses 11128 11119 -9
- Partials 7185 7188 +3
| Files with missing lines | Coverage Ξ | |
|---|---|---|
| src/node_buffer.cc | 69.09% <ΓΈ> (ΓΈ) |
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
- :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
![codecov[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/254?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Just for my education, does it really change the assembly emitted by compilers. This seems trivial to optimize but I don't know much about it π
Just for my education, does it really change the assembly emitted by compilers. This seems trivial to optimize but I don't know much about it π
Yes. The if statement that checks for these conditions will not be evaluated on runtime, but rather on compile time. Since this parameter is a template argument, we can make it a constexpr.
