node
node copied to clipboard
test: execute shell directly for refresh()
What if we just called the shell directly to avoid the cost of booting a Node.js instance?
cc @nodejs/build any concerns?
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 89.14%. Comparing base (
b181535) to head (5888bc2). Report is 11 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #55051 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.13% 89.14%
=======================================
Files 665 665
Lines 193165 193179 +14
Branches 37191 37196 +5
=======================================
+ Hits 172181 172204 +23
- Misses 13729 13730 +1
+ Partials 7255 7245 -10
cc @nodejs/cpp-reviewers @nodejs/tsc would you mind reviewing?
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/63735/
@jasnell @mcollina would you mind reviewing this PR? is it a good idea or a bad one, i'm not sure.
I don't really have a strong opinion on it. The code change looks fine but not sure if it's worthwhile or not. @nodejs/testing folks?
I expect problems in windows, but if we can get it to pass on CI it's ok.
I expect problems in windows, but if we can get it to pass on CI it's ok.
This PR doesn't update Windows implementation. Only UNIX
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/64716/
cc @aduh95 @cjihrig can you re-review? I've addressed your comments.
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/65075/
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/65102/
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/65109/
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/65118/
Landed in 03e9adf876e2039604a038b2eb1476bf4a9e1774