loaders icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
loaders copied to clipboard

Node.js Loaders Team Meeting 2023-06-06

Open mhdawson opened this issue 1 year ago • 5 comments

Time

UTC Tue 06-Jun-2023 18:00 (06:00 PM):

Timezone Date/Time
US / Pacific Tue 06-Jun-2023 11:00 (11:00 AM)
US / Mountain Tue 06-Jun-2023 12:00 (12:00 PM)
US / Central Tue 06-Jun-2023 13:00 (01:00 PM)
US / Eastern Tue 06-Jun-2023 14:00 (02:00 PM)
EU / Western Tue 06-Jun-2023 19:00 (07:00 PM)
EU / Central Tue 06-Jun-2023 20:00 (08:00 PM)
EU / Eastern Tue 06-Jun-2023 21:00 (09:00 PM)
Moscow Tue 06-Jun-2023 21:00 (09:00 PM)
Chennai Tue 06-Jun-2023 23:30 (11:30 PM)
Hangzhou Wed 07-Jun-2023 02:00 (02:00 AM)
Tokyo Wed 07-Jun-2023 03:00 (03:00 AM)
Sydney Wed 07-Jun-2023 04:00 (04:00 AM)

Or in your local time:

  • https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Node.js+Foundation+Loaders%20Team+Meeting+2023-06-06&iso=20230606T1800
  • or https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=06PM+UTC%2C+Jun+06%2C+2023+in+local+time

Links

Agenda

Extracted from loaders-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.

nodejs/node

  • console.log failure while working with worker threads. #30491

Invited

  • Loaders team: @nodejs/loaders

Observers/Guests

Notes

The agenda comes from issues labelled with loaders-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.

Joining the meeting

mhdawson avatar Jun 02 '23 12:06 mhdawson

Anything to chat about today?

JakobJingleheimer avatar Jun 06 '23 12:06 JakobJingleheimer

I took the loaders agenda label off of https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/30491 since it’s been on for a few meetings now. I don’t know of any issues to discuss, but happy to meet if others want to.

GeoffreyBooth avatar Jun 06 '23 15:06 GeoffreyBooth

I think we're in a daisy-chain of blocked—some broken test (that has nothing to do with ESM) is blocking @aduh95's PR which apparently blocks everything else? So we're in a holding pattern til that broken test is fixed.

JakobJingleheimer avatar Jun 06 '23 15:06 JakobJingleheimer

In the meantime we can at least get register ready to land as soon as the upstream blocks are resolved. Is there anything left to do for that one?

If not, we could do the follow-up of merging the classes and removing the need for --loader. If that follow-up is small enough it could even just be merged into the main register PR.

GeoffreyBooth avatar Jun 06 '23 15:06 GeoffreyBooth

I believe the register PR is done (just waiting for upstream PRs to land and unblock it).

I could branch off that PR to start the reunification stuff; that usually makes me nervous, but maybe it's okay here. (I think it should be kept atomic in a separate PR)

JakobJingleheimer avatar Jun 06 '23 15:06 JakobJingleheimer