CMake support

[wonder-mice]

Hi, I'm going to write CMakeLists.txt for http-parser to use it in my project. I could put a bit more effort into it (add tests support, install step, etc.) if you are interested in merging CMake support in. I see that http-parser also has Make and GYP support, and having third build system could be too much. What do you think about it?

[Lupus]

+1

2015-07-02 21:45 GMT+03:00 wonder-mice [email protected]:

Hi, I'm going to write CMakeLists.txt for http-parser to use it in my project. I could put a bit more effort into it (add tests support, install step, etc.) if you are interested in merging CMake support in. I see that http-parser also has Make and GYP support, and having third build system could be too much. What do you think about it?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/joyent/http-parser/issues/257.

Regards, Konstantin

[indutny]

Considering that there not going to be much build changes, I'm totally fine with it. Please go ahead! ;)

Thanks.

[r3n4ud]

+1

[jasnell]

@wonder-mice ... is this still something you're interested in?

[RWOverdijk]

:+1:

[wonder-mice]

Yes, I have it almost ready, but can't find enough time to groom it before publishing.

[rfdickerson]

Similarly, any interest in a pkg-config file? (.pc)?

[grobx]

Any news ?

[flandr]

Sent out a pull request with a minimal CMake build. It only provides static and shared instances of the main library target, but I think it will be more productive to start basic and iterate from there rather than waiting for a complete port of all the Makefile targets, etc.

[solvingj]

There are now two PR's adding cmake support. Would @bnoordhuis or anyone else be willing to validate/rebase and merge one of them?