Off-boarding Danielle Adams (@danielleadams)

[RafaelGSS]

The following steps should be taken as part of the offboarding process:

• [x] Be removed from the GitHub releasers team in the Node.js organizations.
• [x] Be removed from the GitHub security-release team in the Node.js and nodejs-private organizations.
• [x] Ensure their SSH key is removed from the dist user on the primary www server.
• [x] Move their GPG key in nodejs/node README.md to the 'Other keys used to sign some previous releases' section.
• [x] Open a PR in nodejs/docker-node to remove their GPG key from node.keys.
• [x] Ensure they are moved to 'Emeritus - Releasers team' in the nodejs/release README.
• [x] Remove them from the #nodejs-release-private team on the OpenJS Slack.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/1036

[richardlau]

See also https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55381 re. moving to collaborator emeritus in the core repo.

[targos]

Be removed from the GitHub releasers team in the Node.js organizations.

Is the plural form a typo or there really are more than one "Node.js organizations" ?

[richardlau]

Be removed from the GitHub releasers team in the Node.js organizations.

Is the plural form a typo or there really are more than one "Node.js organizations" ?

I think the plural form is a typo. We don't have a releasers team anywhere other than nodejs, unlike the security-release team which exists in both nodejs and nodejs-private (on that note, maybe the checklist for security-release should be two checks (one per org)).

[richardlau]

FWIW the typo is copy/pasted from https://github.com/nodejs/Release/blob/main/GOVERNANCE.md#offboarding-releasers

[RafaelGSS]

Yeah, I've just copied and pasted from the governance section.

[aduh95]

It looks like all the action items have been ticked off, closing as completed. Let's reopen if I missed something.