test: run test on Node.js 23
Summary by CodeRabbit
-
New Features
- Added support for Node.js version 23 in the CI pipeline.
-
Documentation
- Enhanced documentation for the
urllibpackage with new sections, examples, and detailed explanations of therequestmethod and its options. - Expanded
API DocandResponse Objectsections for better clarity. - Included advanced use case examples and updated benchmarks for performance metrics across Node.js versions.
- Enhanced documentation for the
Walkthrough
The changes in this pull request include updates to the GitHub Actions CI pipeline configuration to support an additional Node.js version (23) in the .github/workflows/nodejs.yml file. Additionally, the README.md file has been significantly enhanced with new sections, examples, and detailed explanations regarding the usage of the urllib package, particularly focusing on TypeScript, ESM, CommonJS, and advanced use cases. The test files have also been refined to improve error handling and assertions related to the HttpClient and writeStream functionalities.
Changes
| File | Change Summary |
|---|---|
| .github/workflows/nodejs.yml | Updated Node.js version parameter from '18.19.0, 18, 20, 22' to '18.19.0, 18, 20, 22, 23'. |
| README.md | Enhanced documentation for urllib with new sections, examples, and detailed explanations of the request method and its options. Added advanced use case examples and updated benchmarks. |
| test/HttpClient.test.ts | Updated assertions for connection statistics and validation of client options in HttpClient tests. |
| test/options.writeStream.test.ts | Refined error handling assertions and timing for writeStream functionality tests, including new error codes. |
| package.json | Added "module" field for ESM compatibility, removed "source" from "exports", and updated "main" field. |
| src/fetch.ts | Enhanced type safety and error handling diagnostics in the fetch method of FetchFactory. |
| examples/search_github.cjs | Added logging of response.data after the promise resolves from the urllib.request call. |
| examples/timing.cjs | Commented out dataType: 'json' in the options object for httpClient.request method. |
| test/options.compressed.test.ts | Removed import of nodeMajorVersion and updated error handling logic for gzip and brotli content. |
Possibly related PRs
- #514: The changes in
.github/workflows/nodejs.ymlin this PR involve updating the Node.js versions used in the workflow, which is directly related to the main PR's update of the Node.js version parameter in the same file.
Suggested labels
enhancement
Poem
In the garden where code does bloom,
New Node versions chase away the gloom.
With docs so clear, and examples bright,
Developers hop with pure delight!
A rabbit's cheer for updates grand,
In the world of code, we take a stand! 🐇✨
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.Generate unit testing code for this file.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.@coderabbitai modularize this function.
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)
- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a
.coderabbit.yamlfile to the root of your repository. - Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 94.75%. Comparing base (
55a634c) to head (db3b6c1). Report is 2 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #543 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 94.70% 94.75% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 9 9
Lines 1208 1164 -44
Branches 281 288 +7
==========================================
- Hits 1144 1103 -41
+ Misses 60 57 -3
Partials 4 4
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
🚨 Try these New Features:
- Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests
- JS Bundle Analysis - Avoid shipping oversized bundles