noconnor

I think whats happing is you are running all your tests and then running a suite class annotated with @JUnitPerf that re-runs all your tests , so you run all...

> Info from other issue are conflicting. May be it is better to be uniform i.e. not manipulating normal junit.. that way it is consistent.. Its not manipulating junit, the...

Looks like these tests are missing from the report: ``` *** com.tejasoft.edu.bank.tests.doubles.spys.TestBAWSpy 2 0 0 1.856s 100% *** com.tejasoft.edu.calc.date.tests.bdd.ccbr.suites.TestSuiteCCBRDateCalc 8 0 0 0.049s 100% *** com.tejasoft.edu.calc.rpn.tests.bdd.ccbr.suites.TestSuiteCCBRRPNCalc 14 0 0 0.972s...

Yes. Junit calls the junitperf interceptor. The interceptor calls the test as many times as it can in 60secs. Then the test is marked as completed.

Yes, this makes sense now. I can see from the logs that the interceptor is not being triggered for these tests. The `junitperf-junit5` library provides a [junit5-extension](https://www.baeldung.com/junit-5-extensions) to turn junit5...

> Downloaded CSV can contain full details of the test case including column header to say test attempt and time taken In the html report, the CSV download just contains...

I didn't change anything to do with report generation other then add skipped tests. Would you have overridden the `src/main/resources/report.template` by any chance?

I _think_ this is because lombok is being used in the source code. I'll see if delombok'ing source files before publishing helps in future releases. https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-201514/Library-source-does-not-match-the-bytecode-for-class-for-classes-using-Lombok