no_identd
no_identd
> Perhaps, we need to consider a more modern tokenizer as NLTK default `word_tokenize()`? Consider #2202? :)
Also, of note, the current bug (I mean #1214) seems to miss the tokenizer label
@alvations still missing the label :p
@andreasvc have you seen https://github.com/nltk/nltk/issues/2202#issuecomment-446736329 +sequel? I wonder how one could accommodate both simultaneously and/or in a hybrid manner 🤔
@xldenis do you still work on this?
Unfortunately I lack the time to do so, sorry :(
See also https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/1573 by @seriousme. @epoberezkin originally closed https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/issues/1745 as a duplicate of that one, but 8 days later reopened it
@MatanYemini check https://github.com/cdimascio/express-openapi-validator/pull/713
@seriousme @MatanYemini try with https://github.com/cdimascio/express-openapi-validator/pull/713#issuecomment-1140492669, or newer?
Sorry for the necro, but, over here: https://github.com/XCompWiz/Mystcraft-Issues/issues/379#issuecomment-578620541 @TimTinkers points out that they managed to get Mystcraft to work with SpongeForge by 'downgrading' to SpongeForge 7.1.7-RC3775. However, that's actually newer...