Nicholas Earl

You can get around this by making sure the `absolute` property is true. This ensures that the components are attached to the enclosing `div` instead of the `body` of the...

Ah, I see what you were after. According to Vuetify, this is not the intended way the hover the navigation drawer works; temporarily expanded drawers are supposed to slide _over_...

Hey @andycasey! We do have an implementation for reading IRAF FITS format [in the previous specutils iteration](http://specutils.readthedocs.io/en/doc-testing/_modules/specutils/io/read_fits.html#read_fits_spectrum1d), although it has not been brought over to the new specutils yet. If...

I personally have strong feelings against including plotting functionality (especially as methods directly on the `Spectrum1D` class), as this really feels like a separation of concerns issue, and I don't...

The failure of the WCS parsing is at the astropy FITSWCS-level -- that is to say, the astropy fits machinery _expects_ that the dispersion axis is strictly ordered. I think...

WCS handling has been updated to support both _strictly_ ascending _and_ descending data, but non-ordered data is still not supported (and probably can't be at least in the wcs). @eteq...

What data are you using?

Even though we only have an [arithmetic test](https://github.com/astropy/specutils/blob/master/specutils/tests/test_arithmetic.py) that tests addition -- subtraction, division, and multiplication should work. Currently, those are the only operator overloads implemented. You'd have to override...

Note that the arithmetic operations are implemented in the [`NDArithmeticMixin`](https://github.com/astropy/astropy/blob/29a8a23d55590a202c19c624aa2e927eb30fed01/astropy/nddata/mixins/ndarithmetic.py#L518). More operations would have to be implemented there. Although, "old" specviz did not support these other operations, so we can...

@brechmos-stsci 2. and 3. are already supported. See @crawfordsm's link to the docs.