mintrayr icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
mintrayr copied to clipboard

Mintrayr doesn't work with Firefox "Quantum" v57.0

Open blisterbutt opened this issue 8 years ago • 12 comments

As above.

blisterbutt avatar Nov 15 '17 12:11 blisterbutt

+1

qwertychouskie avatar Nov 15 '17 17:11 qwertychouskie

Please, implement Quantum!!!

ghost avatar Nov 17 '17 08:11 ghost

Yes please! This is my favorite add-on 'cause it comes in handy at work. (^_^ )

TheSquirrelMafia avatar Nov 20 '17 17:11 TheSquirrelMafia

Yes, this is a must-have addon, that is really missing from Firefox 57+. It would be a great help if you could update it as a Webextension.

batagy avatar Nov 23 '17 19:11 batagy

It would be great if it worked with Firefox "Quantum" v57.0...

lexterror avatar Nov 24 '17 02:11 lexterror

Please please please update this for new Firefox, must have extension and missed : (

dubecho avatar Nov 25 '17 23:11 dubecho

+1

njushal avatar Nov 29 '17 11:11 njushal

+1

taword avatar Dec 07 '17 14:12 taword

Please use the 👍 reaction on the original comment instead of adding a new comment. That way people can subscribe to this issue and be notified only about relevant information (e.g. responses from the developer, suggestions for alternatives, etc.)

smmr0 avatar Dec 07 '17 18:12 smmr0

On the contrary, if the dev's inbox gets spammed with enough +1s, maybe @nmaier will update the addon just to restore sanity to their inbox ;)

qwertychouskie avatar Dec 07 '17 18:12 qwertychouskie

@qwertychouskie Lol true, but not without spamming my inbox (and 10 other participants' inboxes) at the same time

smmr0 avatar Dec 07 '17 18:12 smmr0

So I was looking into this a little (since I really miss mintrayr) and I have some doubts as to if it is possible to update the extension. Specifically, lookng at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Porting_a_legacy_Firefox_add-on and https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Comparison_with_XUL_XPCOM_extensions since webextensions give less (by design) control over the UI than XUL extensions did.

I'm not saying it is impossible (I haven't spent too much time on this), but there might be some serious rethinking needed.

Has anyone (@nmaier maybe) looked at the new API in any detail and have any ideas? I'm willing to help if there is a clear path forward, but I'm not sure what (if anything) that path is at the moment.

jcvernaleo avatar Dec 07 '17 18:12 jcvernaleo