Nevin ":-)" Liber

Results 56 comments of Nevin ":-)" Liber

While writing the tests, I read through the [parallel_scan](https://kokkos.org/kokkos-core-wiki/API/core/parallel-dispatch/parallel_scan.html) documentation. It has this requirement: > The type ReturnType of the functor operator must be compatible with the ReturnType of the...

@twLQCD I've been playing around with this, and I think the correct solution is to constrain (SFINAE) the operators so that any type passed as a template parameter to `Kokkos::complex`...

Deprecating the forms of the operators that are not in the standard and put in the forms of the operators that are in the standard won't solve the problem in...

I am exploring my ideas from https://github.com/kokkos/kokkos/pull/8137#issuecomment-3014245995 in #8212.

Open questions involving `Kokkos::complex` & `std::complex`: 1. Given that `Kokkos::complex /= std::complex` could never compile and no one has noticed, do we really need any of these mixed operations between...

Answering my own questions: 1. For now, adding in all the `std::complex` versions of operators. If we (the Kokkos team) determines we don't want them, will deprecate them under a...