Noah Levitt comments

Repositories
Issues
Comments

Results 43 comments of


                                            Noah Levitt

resolving a surt-timestamp collision should not replace a non-revisit record with a revisit record

I like this idea. ``` keyv2 = (urlkey, timestamp, filename, offset) ```

Replication secondary applies the last batch over and over

We left it that way because rocksdb sequence numbers are not unique. For example: ``` 18:43:33:nlevitt@ait-cdx-qa-sec-01:~$ curl -gsS 'http://ait-cdx-qa-master:8080/archiveit-limbo/changes?size=10485760&since=51370259' |& less [ {"sequenceNumber": "51370259", "writeBatch": "E9kPAwAAAACkAAAAAYgBZnV6enk6Y29tLHZpbWVvY2RuLHNr {"sequenceNumber": "51370423", "writeBatch": "t9kPAwAAAAAAAAAA"},...

Replication secondary applies the last batch over and over

Yeah I think that would work.