Nathan Lilienthal
Nathan Lilienthal
I'll need to look into the root cause of this. Might be related to a `shuffle` somewhere.
There is no explanation here for the convention around `emmet.js` vs `Emmet.js`.
It would be cool to add functions to brainfuck. Some things like `+++[- > something < ]>.` could be nicely packaged into a function.
I'm not exactly sure how I see this working yet, but I think we should be able to make the parsing and the display one bit of code. At the...
We really want to make this an optional argument. For example: ```sh brainfuck --limit 1M ... # or brainfuck -l 20 ``` Exact details of the number syntax should be...
Inspired by mossberg/bfcfg we should add this notion to the `Program`. Also adding a graphviz display of the graph would be cool like was done in the mentioned repository.
Right now we simply return an `Option` for a program's get method. This allows us to tell when we have an instruction, but it doesn't let us determine if the...
In an effort to start some simple optimizations, we could save a bunch of space in some brainfuck programs by determining up front that some `while` loops (aka `[...]` constructs)...
Doing the following doesn't work as expected. ``` ruby class Foo include Contracts class Num def foo(a) 1 end end end ``` Shows the method as an instance method.