poetry2nix
poetry2nix copied to clipboard
nix-community
Extras functionality
poetry supports the notion of an optional library/application dependency through the use of the extras feature. It would be swell if poetry2nix supported the ability to create an environment using something analogous to this feature to control what extras are in the environment.
Maybe this already exists and I'm just not seeing it!
Extras are already supported implicitly since they are resolved in the lock file.
We even have a test case covering it: https://github.com/nix-community/poetry2nix/tree/master/tests/extras.
Did you encounter any problems using extras as-is?
What I am looking for is a way to generate a poetry dev environment from a subset of my project's extras. It looks like the test you linked is testing extras from dependencies.
Does poetry support specifying extras for the project when generating an environment?
What I am looking for is a way to generate a poetry dev environment from a subset of my project's extras. It looks like the test you linked is testing extras from dependencies.
I believe we currently treat optional dependencies as mandatory, so right now this isn't well supported.
I would imagine extras being an argument accepted by mkPoetryPackages/mkPoetryEnv/mkPoetryApplication.
Does poetry support specifying extras for the project when generating an environment?
https://python-poetry.org/docs/pyproject/#extras
What I am looking for is a way to generate a poetry dev environment from a subset of my project's extras. It looks like the test you linked is testing extras from dependencies.
I believe we currently treat optional dependencies as mandatory, so right now this isn't well supported. I would imagine
extrasbeing an argument accepted bymkPoetryPackages/mkPoetryEnv/mkPoetryApplication.Does poetry support specifying extras for the project when generating an environment? Cool. https://python-poetry.org/docs/pyproject/#extras
Definitely aware of this already, I don't think I could have used this project successfully without being aware of extras :) this question was really just a restatement of my first question.