Nitsan Wakart

AFU change can be implemented for JCTools, might be worth it. I'm similarly open to extending the AtomicRefArray (you objected last we discussed it, but I actually have no issue...

Related to #87

We are looking at 3 distinct API additions: * ‘wakeup’ / ‘await’ which allow notifications * ‘sneakyOffer’ * ‘sneakyFill’ We already have a ‘fill’ that serves as a notification at...

I mean that it's not clear how to return from `take` on `wakeup`. `take` should never return `null`, and the thread has not really been interrupted.

This is an always allocating linked array queue variant, unlike spsc/mpsc linked array variants in JCTools at the moment which do not allocate if the queue size doesn't exceed a...

Interesting idea, a PR would be a great step towards evaluating the benefit. I've not seen hard numbers/implementations to support the idea.

While JCTools v0.1 (almost here) will only support the Queue interface (which sucks a bit, but everyone uses) we do plan to have support for claim/commit type queues. To add...

Renamed to reflect conclusion, object reuse is covered in other channels related ticket #14

There's a fixed sized MPSC channel impl in experimental. It's got issues, but there's some progress on this.

Hi, I'm playing with this PR and verified the jar produced will load in JDK 6 which works. I'm not clear on how we are supposed to add the multi-version...