gollum_rails
gollum_rails copied to clipboard
nirnanaaa
Is this project active?
I will make it active again starting in jan 2016. Is this ok with you or do you need it earlier? I just had a bit of a downtime due to project cuts at my work
@akshatpradhan Build should be stable using Ruby 2.2. I will fix the remaining builds ASAP!
Oh, sure, now it comes back to life … I spent half of 2015 writing my own! ;-)
sorry @gerwitz was cancelled by my boss. Now that I am a freelancer, I have much more time for my OSS Projects!
Will it be possible to upgrade to the latest version of gollum-lib? I am suffering from this issue, which was actually solved there. Thanks!
Hm good question. There was once the intention to make this gem a part of the Gollum organization. Since dancinglightning took over the gem name on rubygems I haven't touched the gem at all.
On 30 Oct 2016, 20:27 +0100, Moshe Kamensky [email protected], wrote:
Will it be possible to upgrade to the latest version of gollum-lib? I am suffering from this issuehttps://github.com/gollum/gollum-lib/issues/175, which was actually solved there. Thanks!
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nirnanaaa/gollum_rails/issues/32#issuecomment-257172775, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABA_LiqeKeuwp7bvDBWULxzhQEXGhDoRks5q5O-3gaJpZM4G7n23.
Oh, this is confusing... I did not realise there was another project. I have "gem 'gollum_rails'" in my Gemfile, and what I get is this one. Also, looking at the other one, it seems to have essentially nothing in common with this one (for example, it does not use gollum-lib at all...) Is this one still alive? Thanks!
i could update all dependencies and release a new version I guess since he doesn't really maintain it either. You're totally right it is confusing, just because our original intention was that gollum_rails should not just be the activemodel wrapper, but also a complete - optional - rails extension. Will work on this tomorrow. I'll let you know when it's all updated!
@mkamensky try the 3.0.0 release. Although this is not a major release, I thought that more people are actually using the 1.X.X release than the 2.0 release!
