nir0s
nir0s
I'll release a version with a fix for this soon
It seems like it was already added here: https://github.com/nir0s/python-packer/pull/8/commits/f7d33e44518303a41aa931840ea1758609eeec5c. see here: https://amoffat.github.io/sh/sections/special_arguments.html#out for reference
In an unrelated subject, I'm doing quire a refactoring for v0.2.0 so it'll be easier to retrieve output, but I don't think it'll be trivial to do what you asked...
Will add it soon
While I definitely agree we should add a warning, I disagree that we should state that it shouldn't be used to make decisions. Rather, I think it makes sense to...
@encukou, I'd appreciate it if you proposed the wording for the wording. Also, where do you think the warning should go?
I guess we could easily implement a class per special case. Thing is, if we don't do if else here to explicitly provide the distros we know are "problematic", we'll...
I'm with @brejoc here. The reason why you need distro in the first place is to abstract long-term ugliness.
This requires some more thinking. `version_parts()` is meant to provide `major`, `minor` and `patch`/`build` numbers. We need to standardize this. Let's leave this for later.
So, My idea was that we implement a class per OS type. Distro will identify the OS it's running on (Darwin, nt, linux, etc..) and generate a `distro` object for...