Different defaults
Codecov Report
Base: 68.46% // Head: 73.63% // Increases project coverage by +5.17% :tada:
Coverage data is based on head (
f52f80c) compared to base (3a2ea91). Patch coverage: 92.30% of modified lines in pull request are covered.
:exclamation: Current head f52f80c differs from pull request most recent head 37c3ab6. Consider uploading reports for the commit 37c3ab6 to get more accurate results
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #62 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.46% 73.63% +5.17%
==========================================
Files 9 11 +2
Lines 260 330 +70
==========================================
+ Hits 178 243 +65
- Misses 82 87 +5
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| unittests | 73.63% <92.30%> (+5.17%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
| Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| tests/test_distance.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
| helpers.py | 38.33% <68.42%> (+8.78%) |
:arrow_up: |
| conversion_functions.py | 90.00% <83.33%> (+40.00%) |
:arrow_up: |
| background.py | 62.01% <100.00%> (+0.29%) |
:arrow_up: |
| tests/test_conversions.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
| tests/test_helper.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Although I'm sure there are still plenty of datasets we can add, for the moment I think this will do. This takes care of all the infrastructure. @nikosarcevic can you double check that all the parameters are correct?