Niko Matsakis
Niko Matsakis
Current status is that there is a lot of active discussion (primarily in Zulip, with summaries posted to the thread) about the precise mechanism in the RFC, with the goal...
Update 2020-09-21: Current status is that there is a pending RFC that lang team folks out to be reading (and others!). https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2981 The RFC was recently updated based on some...
Update 2020-10-12 @rylev, @joshtriplett -- we discussed this a bit during 2020-10-12 and had a few questions arise in the meeting (will also post to the RFC): * Niko reports...
Update and summary of conversation: * Thread is pretty active, some debate about what the "minimum surface area" truly is. * The `Here!` macro is one center of controversy, follow...
Update 2020-10-26: * Would still like a follow-up design meeting, but haven't gotten organized yet.
cc @joshtriplett
This is a good comment. I'm not sure how best to handle the formatting. I think it's mildly orthogonal from the RFC, but still worthy of consideration in general. @estebank...
> Of all of these, I'm partial to the first one, as it is the easiest to read. Funny, this is what we used to do, but we moved away,...
Numbering is an interesting idea, though: ``` error[E0506]: cannot write to `x` while borrowed --> :4:5 | 3 | x.push(x.pop().unwrap()); | - ---- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | | | [2] then, write...
Yeah, I intentionally left them out because I kind of ran out of time and it seemed fairly orthogonal to me. But it would be good to include. I was...