Niko Matsakis
Niko Matsakis
@rustbot +I-lang-nominates +I-types-nominated I'm nominating this for @rust-lang/lang and @rust-lang/types discussion. I myself am in favor of this RFC. I've seen a lot of demand for a simplified version of...
I guess that my question to the lang/types teams, respectively, are: 1. Lang: what do people think about the motivation here as well as the more limited proposal? Are there...
One though -- @Jules-Bertholet -- I'm not sure if the RFC covers it, I didn't have time to read in super detail, but I think that if you are implementing...
@Jules-Bertholet > Notably, you would need to handle name collisions. Yes. Presumably that would be an error.
@Jules-Bertholet good callout -- I think the error would have to be if your impl contains a single function item that is ambiguous.
We discussed this some in our @rust-lang/lang meeting today. We didn't come to a full consensus but we raised a few points: * People in meeting seemed generally positive about...
I found the motivation in the RFC a bit off-target. I think that the 'weak-strong' concept is correct, but not really *specific* to trait aliases. Every subtrait corresponds to a...
@rfcbot approved I'm in favor of the idea.
@rfcbot reviewed
@Jules-Bertholet we discussed this in the @rust-lang/lang planning meeting and we were concerned that the RFC didn't really have much for motivation. @workingjubilee mentioned that there was strong motivation, but...