Niko Matsakis
Niko Matsakis
Yes, that is what this issue is about. The difficulty of writing wrappers that work with `Poll`, the need to use `pin-project`, etc.
@jbr I for one would very much like to read more stories about this. I'm not of exactly how they compare to the existing stories, but I still feel like...
I agree that an alternate name might be better! Early Explorers is ok, but a bit complex. Beta testers? Consultants? Testers? Designed testers? I've heard the term "bravehearts" used, but...
Maybe something with Ferris... The Ferris Ferrets, ferreting out bugs? ok, that's crossed over into inane. :)
I think I might rather make that Grace's concern; it's kind of a generalization of "memory safety". The goal was that we cover the key attributes of Rust with one...
I'd be happy to add such a variant, I would also love to hear if there are more specific stories that result from it.
Some notes about attached vs detached streams and how interconversion might work (and what hurdles we know of, mostly a question of coherence) can be found in this hackmd: https://hackmd.io/gHqlQBTiSrexwb-ppRPn-A...
Some concerns that should block opening the RFC * [x] (Minor) Resolve the name question of attached vs lending * [x] Add `next` method to the stream so it can...
The main two things I would like to see added to the RFC: * An explanation for why the `next` method requires `Self: Unpin`. * Some coverage about generator syntax...
@stuhood thanks for the example! I'd love to see a write-up dramatizing and spelling out some of the downsides of this macro approach you ended up with.