Nico Rehwaldt

@jarekdanielak This may not be an easy pick, at last. Integration with karma (our test runner) is broken by the update - https://github.com/bpmn-io/bpmn-js/pull/2174/commits/c41dd8e15cd099cc48aebab6818c9b6eeedb496d:  If you want to pursue this...

Thanks @joewarner. I think this is a reasonable ask. I'll look into how straight forward it is to implement this change.

Good draft by @copilot. I've simplified the test, and ensured there is some "real world use" in the actual extension.

Added a bunch of housekeeping changes on top, plus verified that we'd in theory be able to test Camunda 8 properties using the setup (https://github.com/bpmn-io/bpmn-js-differ/pull/30/commits/8ffdf6bc2da41f01575f636881b3644498178b28).

Makes sense, we could consider to fix this at some point.

I love your report and would kindly ask you to use our existing issue template. Important context may otherwise not be provided; for example we routinely ask you for alternatives...

Would a white background of labels be a solution for you? I find this to be a common pattern for labels across different drawing and editor tools. 

We identified that `correlationKey` cannot simply be removed, but there is different use-cases for message start events: * Inside an event sub-process a `correlationKey` can be defined to tie the...

After todays discussion I collected/updated the following issues: * https://github.com/camunda/camunda-modeler/issues/5010 - it should not be possible to apply a template for typed start events inside of a standard sub-process *...

I think we found a regression with the [upcoming properties panel fixes](https://github.com/bpmn-io/properties-panel/commit/1c4c45ade759e5901875ee0fdb90ff1c605fa9f7). I can confirm that it works with v5.41.0 and updated the environment accordingly. But it does not work...